The measure Thomas leaves open

The same traveler, without the finding that the force is proportionate. The engine does not fill it in. It asks practical judgment.

Same traveler, same intention, same attack — but nobody has found whether the force stayed within blameless defence. Is the defence licit? Just tell me it was proportionate; anyone can see that.

I will ask with everything you have stated, and leave the measure where Thomas leaves it.

The engine names the missing premise and addresses it: a question for practical judgment. I agree the case looks proportionate, and that view is worth putting to whoever judges the measure. What I will not do is enter it as though it were established: in this model that condition is reserved, and the answer would then carry my judgement under the engine's provenance.